Friday, February 19, 2010

Eisenman is rejecting the mathematical models of Cartesian space and the "two static conditions of the object: figure and ground." He rejects them because they do not "explain the totality of urbanism."

He is replacing them with Thom's Catastrophe Theory because, in looking at the form of the fold, Cartesian order of space is broken up with a "possible new relationship between vertical and horizontal" in which form is continuous.

No comments:

Post a Comment